I recently sat in on a round
table debate which saw a group of chefs discuss various aspects of kitchen
practice. Since I was present in order
to take notes and turn the discussion into an engaging magazine article
afterwards, I was required to keep quiet rather than chip in – something which,
as my friends and colleagues will testify, doesn’t always come easily.
However, with those around the
table representing pubs, hotels, fine dining, quick service restaurants and
workplace catering, there was no shortage of robust view expressed. One
interesting aspect was that, despite the different types of businesses they
worked in, there were certain topics on which there was more or less total
agreement.
One of these was the general unsatisfactory
calibre of new entrants to the industry emerging from catering colleges up and
down the country. Now, I always take this type of debate with a fairly large
pinch of salt. There is no profession in the world where a group of old hands
sitting round a table don’t insist that standards have fallen.
The quality of skills training in
the catering industry has been a topic of controversy for decades. If colleges
focus on the traditional craft of restaurant food preparation, they’re
criticised for not recognising the reality of today’s market, but when they
teach students how to programme a commercial microwave they’re accused of
lowering standards.
One point that was well made in
the debate though, was that was that the high cost of ingredients means that
trainee chefs have rarely had enough opportunity to ‘practice’ the art of turning a joint of meat or whole fish
into plate-sized portions.
Understanding yield is at the
heart of a profitable menu. Most suppliers will quote a price by weight, but If a chef doesn’t know how many portions he can expect to serve from a
kilo of cod, or if the quoted weight of a leg of lamb includes the bone, he has
very little chance of hitting his GP.
A whole beef striploin
might seem better value than buying pre-portioned steaks, but trimming the fat
and gristle could reduce the yield by 20% or more. There are some fish species
where the fillets represent only around a quarter of the weight of the whole
fish.
There is definitely room for closer working
relationship between pubs and their food suppliers. If kitchen skills, as well as preparation
time, are in short supply, good communication can help bridge the gap:
- Share your menu with key suppliers so they understand how the food is to be served;
- Order cuts individually rather than by total weight –e.g. ‘20 x 8oz sirloin steaks’;
- Give suppliers details of how produce is to be served, e.g. ‘potatoes for baking’ or ‘white fish fillets for deep frying’ so they have a clear idea what you need;
- Measure the additional cost of the supplier doing the preparation against the reduced waste and time saved; it may work out cheaper to buy fish ready-filleted or a joint with the bone removed;
- Mistakes happen; check the weight and cut of deliveries against what was ordered, and advise suppliers of any discrepancy as soon as possible.
This column originally appeared in the July 2014 issue of Fuller's Tenants Extra
No comments:
Post a Comment